<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Music Organization Tips: What Are Those Songs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Technology, Media, News &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Koby</title>
		<link>http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Koby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>Yea, I don&#039;t like the UI on the Picard version either.  I&#039;m glad the MusicBrainz stuff helped though.

Keep in mind that it&#039;s all based on percentages, so some of those songs that didn&#039;t get identified might be accurately identified, the percentages just didn&#039;t match whatever the default settings for the taggers are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I don&#8217;t like the UI on the Picard version either.  I&#8217;m glad the MusicBrainz stuff helped though.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that it&#8217;s all based on percentages, so some of those songs that didn&#8217;t get identified might be accurately identified, the percentages just didn&#8217;t match whatever the default settings for the taggers are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Koby</title>
		<link>http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-6146</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Koby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/#comment-6146</guid>
		<description>Yea, I don&#039;t like the UI on the Picard version either.  I&#039;m glad the MusicBrainz stuff helped though.

Keep in mind that it&#039;s all based on percentages, so some of those songs that didn&#039;t get identified might be accurately identified, the percentages just didn&#039;t match whatever the default settings for the taggers are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I don&#8217;t like the UI on the Picard version either.  I&#8217;m glad the MusicBrainz stuff helped though.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that it&#8217;s all based on percentages, so some of those songs that didn&#8217;t get identified might be accurately identified, the percentages just didn&#8217;t match whatever the default settings for the taggers are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Strube</title>
		<link>http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Strube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.

I got the MusicBrainz Tagger and it worked pretty well.  I dropped 24,000 songs in it and it was able to correctly ID all but about 6000.

I also read on the MusicBrainz site that they aren&#039;t going to support the Tagger any more and to get the Picard version.  I tried that one out and it was able to ID about 2000 more.  The UI on it sucks though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.</p>
<p>I got the MusicBrainz Tagger and it worked pretty well.  I dropped 24,000 songs in it and it was able to correctly ID all but about 6000.</p>
<p>I also read on the MusicBrainz site that they aren&#8217;t going to support the Tagger any more and to get the Picard version.  I tried that one out and it was able to ID about 2000 more.  The UI on it sucks though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Strube</title>
		<link>http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-6147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Strube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkoby.com/2007/02/21/music-organization-tips-what-are-those-songs/#comment-6147</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.

I got the MusicBrainz Tagger and it worked pretty well.  I dropped 24,000 songs in it and it was able to correctly ID all but about 6000.

I also read on the MusicBrainz site that they aren&#039;t going to support the Tagger any more and to get the Picard version.  I tried that one out and it was able to ID about 2000 more.  The UI on it sucks though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.</p>
<p>I got the MusicBrainz Tagger and it worked pretty well.  I dropped 24,000 songs in it and it was able to correctly ID all but about 6000.</p>
<p>I also read on the MusicBrainz site that they aren&#8217;t going to support the Tagger any more and to get the Picard version.  I tried that one out and it was able to ID about 2000 more.  The UI on it sucks though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

